SABACIREBON – Latest report from Politico reveals that there is serious caution within the Pentagon regarding potential allegations of violations of international humanitarian law in attacks on Iranian infrastructure.
Citing two unnamed officials, intense discussions were taking place regarding the classification of targets – whether they were classified as military or civilian.
The review focused on a number of Iranian energy facilities which have a dual function, namely serving the needs of society while supporting military operations. This condition raises a legal dilemma, because in international armed conflicts, civilian objects are protected unless they are clearly used for military purposes.
Also Read: Dozens of Companies in North Jakarta Have Not Paid THR, Summons Will Be Made Immediately
The debate even covers vital facilities such as water desalination plants. Some in Washington argue that the facilities could be legitimate targets because they also supply basic military needs, even though their impact on civilians is significant.
Meanwhile, a United Nations spokesperson, Stéphane Dujarricasserting that attacks on civilian infrastructure—such as bridges and power plants—potentially violate international law.
Tensions increased after the President’s statement Donald Trump in late March that threatened the total destruction of Iran’s strategic energy facilities, including Kharg Island and water installations, if a deal and vital routes were not reached Strait of Hormuz remains closed.
Also Read: Jonathan…
